Pensions Ombudsman determination

Ica Pension Scheme · CAS-33285-P8V3

Complaint not upheld2020
Get your free legal insight →Email to a colleague
Get your free legal insight on this case →

Verbatim text of this Pensions Ombudsman determination. Sourced directly from the Pensions Ombudsman published register. The Pensions Ombudsman is a statutory tribunal — its determinations are public record. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase.

Full determination

CAS-33285-P8V3

Ombudsman’s Determination Applicant Mrs A

Scheme ICA Pension Scheme (the Scheme)

Respondent Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Ltd (RLMISL)

Outcome

Complaint summary

Background information, including submissions from the parties

1 CAS-33285-P8V3

Mrs A’s position

2 CAS-33285-P8V3 Adjudicator’s Opinion

• Mrs A said that, as far as she could recollect, she only received one payment from her employer after she left employment. While this may be the case, in the Adjudicator’s view, it was more likely than not that CIS issued the refund to the employer. So, CIS could not be held responsible for the acts or omissions of the employer.

Ombudsman’s decision

3 CAS-33285-P8V3

Anthony Arter

Pensions Ombudsman 9 January 2020

4